STARTLED ISN’T A STRATEGY: WHY SELF-DEFENSE REQUIRES INTENT
- Originally published:
- June 24, 2025
By Jeffrey S. Straub · 2 min read
STARTLED ISN’T A STRATEGY: WHY SELF-DEFENSE REQUIRES INTENT
Sponsored by 2A Self-Defense Law. Written by Jeffrey Straub.
Back in May 2024, a guy in Memphis opened fire on a woman during a traffic incident on I-240. His excuse? He was “startled.”
That’s right. Startled.
Not ambushed. Not under siege. Just startled. Like a squirrel when the screen door slams.
Let me translate that into plain English: “I panicked and pulled the trigger.” And that’s exactly what he did on a woman he was already tailgating, while he was already wanted for carjacking and assault. But now we’re supposed to pretend this was a righteous defensive gun use?
Nah. Not even close.
Let’s get something straight, especially for the folks who carry legally and take their training seriously:
Self-defense is an intentional act.
You don’t stumble into it. You don’t accidentally fall into it like a pothole. You choose it—because you reasonably believe that you or someone else is about to suffer death or serious bodily harm, and you act on purpose to stop that.
Tennessee law (Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-611) backs that up. It doesn’t say, “You’re allowed to shoot people if your blood pressure spikes and you get shaky.” It says you need to believe, reasonably, that deadly force is necessary. Not maybe. Not oops. Not “startled.”
And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
From what I’ve seen, 75% of the self-defense claims that actually get tested in court?
Garbage.
Not trained, disciplined citizens acting under pressure. Just bad guys trying to retroactively clean up their stupidity by slapping the word “fear” on it.
You see it all the time: someone starts a fight, escalates it, panics, overreacts, and then tries to claim they were scared. That’s not self-defense. That’s just a confession with extra steps.
“But I was startled!”
Okay? So is a cat when the vacuum turns on. That doesn’t make it a victim.
Fear doesn’t get you there. Reasonable fear does. And your response has to be intentional and proportional. Anything less? You’re not a defender. You’re just another unstable idiot with a gun.
So next time you hear a news story about someone “startled” into pulling the trigger, ask one thing:
Was it reasonable—and was it on purpose?
If not, it’s not self-defense.
It’s just bad decision-making with a muzzle flash.
⸻
Want to actually know when you’re justified? Stick with 2A Self-Defense Law. We take the fear out of getting it wrong.
#StartledIsntSelfDefense
#2ASelfDefenseLaw
#ReasonableFearMatters
#NotAllShootingsAreJustified
#YoureNotADeer
#SelfDefenseIsIntentional
National Cases and Constitutional Issues
Related articles
National Cases and Constitutional Issues
The First Shot, the Second Shot, and Everything She Did Afterward
October 16, 2026 · 6 min read
National Cases and Constitutional Issues
He Got Out of the Fight. Then He Got a Rifle. Was He Still Acting in Self-Defense?
September 26, 2026 · 10 min read
National Cases and Constitutional Issues
SHE SHOT HER HUSBAND THROUGH A PILLOW. MURDER, RIGHT?
September 19, 2026 · 6 min read
